That would be the way I would summarize Breaking the Missional Code by Ed Stetzer and David Putman. The book is not a “This is how you should do it book” with stories of the right organizational structure and right worship style and right method of evangelism. Those kinds of books are old and tiring. It’s not about the “what” of doing ministry but about the “why” - which is theological - and the discovery process. We must contextualize, contextualize, contextualize. At the same time, we must have a strong understanding of the theological basis for what we do. This book encourages that.
The authors do a great job of reminding that we should do what will reach the community we are called to reach. I don’t like bluegrass music, but if bluegrass music will reach the people in Middletown, DE (which btw, it won’t), then that’s the worship style we need to employ. Everything doesn’t have to be contemporary,. That is the reality of contextualization that the book calls for. Discover and exegete your community and culture - which they provide a good process of doing - and you will find how best to break the code in your context.
I greatly appreciated the emphasis on the theological in the book. Their “Missional Matrix”, which explains the interation of Christology, missiology, and ecclesiology is extremely important. Far too often our the strategy has neglected proper ecclesiology and/or Christology.
I would highly recommend this book as a primer on missional implementation, both for revitalization and church planting. In addition, I would consider this to be a must read for all church leaders. I purchased copies for all my church leaders and are asking them to read it. So go buy yourself about 10 copies and give them to all your friends and family.
If you found this page useful, consider linking to it. Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site. It will look like this:
It’s process, not technique
Related Posts:
Breaking the Missional Code: Chapter 2Different perspectives.
No Quechup with your Fries
2008 Focus: Help Me 2 Change
Our church’s growth plan






















May 27th, 2006 at 9:52 am
i’d be interested to know your thoughts on stetzer/putman’s take on denominations and their role in emerging networks. i thought that chapter was a good start in thinking of denominations in a new light, but that they could have gone a bit further…
May 27th, 2006 at 10:03 am
Adam,
I really think they hit the nail on the head with the denominational thing. Could they have gone deeper? Maybe, but remember Stetzer’s a denominational guy and while I don’t know this to be true, I’m sure some in the denomination that have read this are unhappy with his ideas.
I know that there is talk within your association that they might team up with Acts29 or glocalnet to train or get support support or do other things with.
I think we’ve got to shift focus within the denominations and return to the supporting role the entities and agencies used to be.
Their thoughts on seminary education are important as well. Our association is looking at putting together a pastor’s school to help train indiginous planters because fo the struggle to find people to come to Delaware, and the pure need we have here.
May 27th, 2006 at 12:27 pm
thanks for your insights, bro! pax.