Yesterday I got notice of some new research from the guys at Lifeway’s Research Department regarding opinions about the Bible among Southern Baptist pastors and church members. The article portrays a sharp disconnection between the views held between these two groups.
Upon reading said research, I skyped my friend Todd who allowed me to vent about this. Today he writes a post that just knocks it out of the park. Todd states:
We can battle those in the pews all day long. We can overwhelm them with our theologizing and well-crafted arguments. The problem may lie in how we fought our battle. It may be those in the pews simply reflect what we has been portrayed to them. Talk of an inerrant, infallible Bible followed by pragmatic tactics to win the war of Scriptural fidelity may have left them, and some of us not surveyed, thinking we are all talk.
The issue is that saying “I believe in inerrancy” is not enough. As I quoted in my review of The Blue Parakeet, Scot McKnight noted:
those who have a proper relationship to the Bible never need to speak of the Bible as their authority nor do they speak of the submission to the Bible. They are so in tune with God, so in love with him, that the word “authority” is swallowed up in loving God. Even more, the word “submission” is engulfed in the disposition of listening to God speak through the Bible and in the practice of doing what God calls us to do. (93)
In other words, if my life is wrapped up in God and living the Bible, I don’t have to go around telling people I believe the Bible is inerrant. It becomes evident in my life that it is.
The problem in Southern Baptist circles is that it’s leadership has for years forced people to say they believe the Bible while living an pragmatic ethic in order to achieve victory. Thus our “belief” in inerrancy may reflect nothing more than an intellectual assent, not a life-changing transformation.
Saying we believe in the inerrancy of the Bible is not enough. Living the Bible, with its ethical implications as well as theological is what matters. It wasn’t the people who cried “Lord, Lord” that Jesus said would be in his kingdom. It was the people who loved the unlovely, cared for the poor, and treated people as if they were ministering to the Christ himself that would enter into the kingdom.
If you found this page useful, consider linking to it. Simply copy and paste the code below into your web site. It will look like this:
When Biblical Inerrancy is not Enough
Related Posts:
Book Review – Biblical PacifismThe Biblical Doctrine of Hair
Barna: Church not necessary for Spiritual Growth
Disctinctives of a Missional Church
Ed Stetzer’s Reflections






















August 27th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
David,
I still love the McKnight quote you reference.
August 27th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
David,
When the convention passed their latest resolution condemning the drinking of a glass of wine at your daughters wedding… quickly followed by many in the current SBC Leadership writing article after article defending this unbiblical resolution by stating “We know the Bible does not forbid the drinking of wine, BUT ____ (insert any number of reasons)… One need not be a prophet to see that the SBC may pay lip service to the words “Inerrancy of the Bible”, but they really do not believe in the Sufficiency of the Bible at all.
And until you accept the Sufficiency (that’s code for Authority) of the Bible, then saying it is Inerrant is really meaningless.
Grace Always,