What is God doing?

He had a view of God passed down to him through his family and his experience with God. His understanding of God went something like this: obey God and he will bless you. Disobey God and he will crush you.

By the looks of things, he had been really, really good. A quiver full of kids and more warehousing space than should be allowed, this man had a roaring business. He had great friends and a great home. He treated his employees well, almost like family. His kids were careful to live a godly lifestyle and just in case they didn’t, he would offer a prayer of protection and seek forgiveness for them just in case they partied a bit too hard. He loved his life, his family, his company, and his God.

On this day, he went set out as if it were any other day. Prayer and praise, then off to the job of managing the family business. He was a little later into the office today than usual. He had a meeting on the other side of town. Yet, as he neared the campus, he was excited because business was doing great.

As he rounded the corner, however, a pile of twisted metal and steel lay where one of his warehouses had stood. He couldn’t get into the offices because of the destruction that he saw.  Getting out of his car, one foreman arrived with bad news. There was a great storm that came up earlier that morning and a tornado ripped through the company complex. All his kids, who were part of the family business, were killed. Not only that, but the storm destroyed the entire business complex. Everything was gone.

Tears rolled down the man’s face as he sought to process all that happened. He could not explain it. He could not understand it. All he could do was stand where his empire had been and weep. His wife showed up. They simply held each other. Friends who heard about the destruction raced to his side. Sometimes in time of need, you don’t need people to say anything, but you need people to just be there. That was the actions of his friends. They remained with him for days. They mourned the loss with him.

He mentally walked through the last few weeks of his life. Had he done something that would have made God angry? Had he not done something God had told him to do? He couldn’t think of anything major. Maybe there was something seemingly insignificant he had overlooked. Though he knew he was not perfect, he could not think of anything that would lead God to bring the destruction and ruin to his life that had been brought upon him. He was at a loss to understand these events.

His wife and family were not. When he finally spoke, they begged him over and over to just confess the sin he had done and God would restore it all. However, he refused. He had searched his life and found nothing that would merit this level of pain and destruction. His friends offered no specifics to back up their call to repent.

He was now stuck. Did he continue his understanding of the actions of God or did he reject even the existence of God? Or should he consider a third way, that God was not as he thought. From his perspective it was as though God had betrayed him. How was he to respond to this betrayal?

He determined that he would confront God. God needed to explain himself. All he got was silence. Then another confrontation from his friends. Again, he called out for a forum with the creator to discuss how badly God had treated him. Silence. Confrontation from friends. The cycle continued.

Finally, God spoke. However, he didn’t respond to the man’s inquisition. God confronted the man on his smallness and inability to see and know the heart of the all-knowing, all-powerful, all-present God. How dare he challenge God.

Broken by God’s confrontation, but gratified that at least God showed up, the man accepted his fate.

Yet God was not done with him. God restored his family. He and his wife got pregnant again and had another quiver full of kids. His business rebuilt and it once again became the sprawling industry leader it once was.

But his view of God changed. The box was gone. He responded to the betrayal with the third way. He simply accepted that God was God. It took a betrayal, however to discover that.

In case you did not know recognize that story, it is a retelling of the biblical story of Job. But it could be your life or it mine. This is part of the journey that God takes us through. He has to destroy our image of God so that He can truly sit as king of our life. He has to betray us. By betraying, I mean that God betrays the image we have created of God and the box that we have put Him into. It is a betrayal of our understanding of how we believe God is supposed to act. Yet God does not betray us. Our idea of God betrays us.

There are moments in our life where to truly find God, we have to reject who we believe God to be. If you stay with him through the confusion, you find on the other side, God is who He said He was all along. But it might take a betrayal to begin to see Him as He really is.

Related Posts:

• Monday Highlights: God’s Victory!
• Does religiosity correspond with birthrate?
• Letting Go of God
• De-personfication of God
• A Book Recommendation: Chrysalis by Alan Jamieson

Related posts:

• Judas and the Lord’s Supper
• Ed Young Jr on Church Pirates
• Here’s the Plan for 2009

Has the “church” become frantic activity on the Sabbath? Isn’t a day off for “weak” people? Isn’t “play” just for children? What does creativity have to do with salvation? Are we missing the joy of keeping the Sabbath? Theologian and author Marva Dawn asks us to consider whether or not we are finding rest.

From The Work of the People

(ht: Todd Littleton)

Related Posts:

• No Related Posts

Related posts:

• Wright Wednesdays: NT Wright and the Sacrements
• The sound of school bells
• Are We Living in a Bubble?
• Communicating to change lives: communication design
• My Fall Reading List for School

Fear.

The opposite of Love is not hate. The opposite of love is fear. What does scripture say? Perfect love casts out:

Hate?
Pain?
Anger?
Fluffy the vampire bat?

No, perfect love casts out fear.

Fear is the base emotion. One of the brain structures that is primary to our life is the amygdala. It is the section of the brain that deals with emotions. This brain structure receives important sensory and environmental information first so that the brain can prepare the body for fight or flight behaviors if necessary. It is a base structure. The base emotion that triggers our fight or flight reaction is fear. And primarily, it is the fear of the unknown. If you are camping in the woods and hear a branch snap, your body reacts by freezing, as if you are dead. That happens because of fear… fear of the unknown. Fear causes that physical reaction.

However, fear’s bark is bigger than its bite. At least in most cases. A shotgun pointed to your face by a serial killer is not one of those cases. However, most of our fears are not that dramatic. Most of our fears center around change, or what could happen in a particular situation. For instance, we may be afraid to ask for a raise because we are afraid that if we do, instead of getting the raise our employer may actually fire us. A person may be afraid to go down a water slide because part of it is enclosed. Whether it is claustrophobia or fear of the dark or fear that the slide will fall, some people cannot get past this fear. We may say those are irrational fears, but in the mind of the person, they are very real.

Fears hold a great deal of power because we are primarily emotional beings. When there is fear, a primary emotion, then our behavior will reflect that fear.

This is why I think fear is the primary driver of maladjusted behavior. It all goes back to fear. When there is fear, the body will do something to compensate for that fear. It will either fight or run. Examples of fighting include lashing out verbally or physically attacking some person or some thing. Examples of running (or flight) include ignoring someone or self-medicating through food or drugs.

The biblcial prescription for this is love, primarily perfect love. Perfect love only comes from Jesus. Perfect love removes all fear. It creates a perfect place of safety. When the disciples and Jesus were crossing over the Galilean Sea, a storm arose. The disciples were afraid. Jesus was asleep. When they woke Jesus up, he immediately calmed the sea by saying, “Peace, be still”. The sea was immediately calm. Jesus had been able to sleep through this because he knew the perfect love of the Father. He was safe. It was that same love that was able to calm the sea and eliminate the fear of the disciples. He brought peace to the raging sea and the fear of the disciples.

When we know the perfect love of the Savior, we have no fear. We are fear-less. However, this takes time and relationship. It is only through God going all Job on us from time to time and having him provide exactly the way He promises that we are able to see our fear transformed by His love. We truly begin to trust God and that trust creates that safe place for us.

Peace is not the absence of conflict, it is the absence of fear.

Thanks, Todd Littleton for the discussion this morning on this topic

Related Posts:

• Come to the table, have a listen
• The danger of commodifying worship
• Propositionalism’s failure and its impact on the church
• How we read each other’s minds
• Hyperbolic discounting and the Gospel

Related posts:

• Where Were You When The World Stopped Turning?
• Word for Wednesday – Isaiah 12:2-6
• To my dear wife Brenna…
• Journeys:Transitioning Churches to Relevance
• Atheism and Faith

The Trusting Brain

Since my dissertation included a good bit of brain research, I subscribed to a number of blogs of scientists and brain researchers. One is called “The Frontal Cortex“, which is part of Science Blogs. This morning they have an article on trust and the brain.  The article primarily concerns the economic struggles our country finds itself in and to what degree we will trust the government, business leaders, and our own understanding of the economy. However, the research has implications for our own trust in the Godhead.

The Relevant Study

The writer, Jonah Lehrer, describes a 2005 study led by several Neuroscientists regarding trust.

The research was born out of a serious limitation of conventional fMRI, which looks at the brain by itself. (An individual is put in a claustrophobic scanner and told to perform a task.) Humans, of course, are a social species, so the scientists (led by Montague) pioneered a technique known as hyper-scanning, which allows subjects in different fMRI machines to interact in real time.

The experiment revolved around a simple economic game in which getting the maximum reward required the strangers to trust one another. However, if one of the players grew especially selfish, he or she could always steal from the pot and erase the tenuous bond of trust. By monitoring the players’ brains, the scientists were able to predict whether or not someone would steal money several seconds before the theft actually occurred. The secret was a cortical area known as the caudate nucleus, which closely tracked the payouts from the other player. (The caudate is usually discussed in the context of addiction, since it plays a central role in modulating our expectation of pleasure.) Montague noticed that whenever the caudate exhibited reduced activity, trust tended to break down.

But what exactly is the caudate computing? How do we decide whom to trust with our money? And why do we sometimes decide to stop trusting those people? At first the caudate didn’t get excited until the subjects actually trusted one another and garnered their separate rewards. But over time this brain area started to expect trust, so that it fired long before the reward actually arrived. Of course, if the bond was broken – if someone cheated and stole money – then the neurons stopped firing; social assumptions were proven wrong.

The moral is that trust is ultimately about the expectation of rewards. Trust may be an admirable social trait, but it’s ultimately rooted in a greedy calculation, emanating from our primal dopamine reward circuitry:

Taken together, these results suggest that the head of the caudate nucleus receives or computes information about (i) the fairness of a social partner’s decision and (ii) the intention to repay that decision with trust. In early rounds of the game, the ”intention to trust” is evident only after an investment is revealed. With experience, this signal shifts to a time preceding the revelation of the investment.

What does this have to do with the economy? Over the last few decades, investors have grown accustomed to predictable rewards coming from the financial markets. We were used to our 7 percent return in the stock market, that 4.5 percent return from a money fund, and that 2 percent return from our bank account. We assumed our homes would always increase in value. In other words, these “rewards” were taken for granted. (It hasn’t helped that the last severe recession arrived in the early 1980’s, more than 25 years ago. People forgot that these financial rewards were contingent, just like the players in the trust game who were shocked that someone would abscond with their cash.)

When those rewards disappear – when home prices fall, and borrowers default, and the markets flatline – the end result is a collapse in the bonds of trust that all markets depend on. The problem, of course, is that restoring trust is ultimately about rewards, not reassuring statements or grand plans from Congress. Until those financial rewards start to feel predictable again – and that may take a long, long time – investors will continue to be wary of each other, just like people who got burned in the brain scanner.

The Impact on Life and the Gospel

The results of this study has a great impact for life and how we share the Gospel. Our trust in the Godhead comes only after levels of expectation and reward are observed and received. In other words, trust has to be developed; we do not give God our trust blindly. God, from the moment we are born, sets out to earn our trust. In earning our trust, we then can transition from the God who wants to be in relationship with us, to the the “Santa Claus” view of God to the deeply relational, Fatherly view of God.

In the midst of this process, we have to de-trust God in order to trust him deeper. Our brain has to have it’s’ neurons re-wired so that we can not only trust him more relationally but we can change our behavior in the trusting process. Our brains get wired in a certain way such that our thoughts and actions become automatic. However, to re-wired our brain and allow God to take us places through faith we could never other otherwise go, we have to de-trust what we already know. Then, and only then, can those new trusting circuits be rebuilt.

The reward changes during this process as well. We move from the Santa Claus view of God, where he gives us stuff, and helps us out (reward), to a deep relationship with the Father where the reward is the relationship. That takes a series of trusts and de-trusts where our reward changes over time.

This is what St. John of the Cross called the dark night(s) of the soul. It’s the Chrysalis of Alan Jamison. We will all have a series of stops and starts, a series of trusts and de-trusts, in our relationship with God.

Yet it has great impact on how we share the Gospel. We have to concede that blind trust is not given by humans to God without any relationship whatsoever. Could it be that our starting place is to discover how and in whom people have seen the activity of God. That becomes the starting point, not where will a person will spend eternity when they die. This may have worked in years past because people had some experience with God. However, fewer people have a positive experience with God, assuming they have any, and are less likely to understand that question, accept your premise of them being sinners and needing heaven, or even want to engage you in that conversation. Despite a belief in “God”, experience with Jesus or his followers is minimal. Our starting point, then, is wrong. Our starting point should be discovering what, if any, activity they perceive (or we help them understand) of how God and Jesus has worked in their life to move them to a point of actually being able to trust.

This isn’t brain surgery. It is not rocket science. It is time and relationships and a discernment by us of what the Spirit has done in their life to move them closer to Jesus.

Related Posts:

• Hyperbolic discounting and the Gospel
• Why Denominations Cannot Complete the Great Commission
• How we read each other’s minds
• The Gospel: God’s solution
• What is the Gospel? Sin’s impact

Related posts:

• Open systems, Creativity and Trust
• Word for Wednesday: Psalm 49
• Constructed Theology
• My view on the past 26 years of the SBC – Leading from fear.
• The Gospel: God’s solution

The Theology of Journey

I want to do one last post on the Theology of the Journey. The journey into a deep and powerful Faith in God does something to our theology: it condenses it. That might seem a little strange to say, but I believe it is true. Let me explain more.

During this journey, our theology moves from something that is very black and white to shades of grey. The reason this happens is because so much of what we know about God gets challenged. For instance, we know the promises from scripture about seeking God first and He will provide everything we need. But when you are looking at no money in the checkbook and lots of bills to pay, that belief gets challenged. It’s not as pretty and tidy as we would like for it to be. What if part of this journey means that you have your house foreclosed upon? What if that means you don’t eat for a few days? This is serious stuff that gets challenged in the midst of the journey.

The journey changes our theology because experience may conflict or contradict our interpretation of scripture. It is true that God’s Word never changes. But our understanding of God’s Word does change. For instance, what happens if in the midst of your journey into Faith, you have an experience with ecstatic speech in a biblical manner, something you truly believe ended in the first century? At this point, you have a crisis of Faith. Do you trust the experience, which happened in a biblical manner, or your own interpretation?

When we have experiences similar to this, we learn to hold our interpretation of the scripture loosely. I do not mean that we abandon our beliefs, simply that what may have been black and white becomes grey because our experience with the Word has changed. We have a humble theology. It’s humble orthodoxy.

The Word becomes more relational than propositional. This is a huge transition. The scriptures are inherently relational, not propositional. In fact, Truth is relational, not propositional. Jesus said that He was the way, the truth and the life. No one gets to know the truth apart from relationship. In addition, when Jesus states that you will know the truth and the truth will set you free, He had already announced that He was the truth. In addition, “knowing” is a word that indicates intimacy, as in a man knowing a woman. It’s a relational word, not an intellectual word. Paul also uses the idea of experiential knowing in Colossians 1:9 “For this reason also, since the day we heard of it, we have not ceased to pray for you and to ask that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding,” The phrase “filled with the knowledge” is to be understood as filled with the experiential knowledge.

When Paul says in 2 Timothy 1:12 “For this reason I also suffer these things, but I am not ashamed; for I know whom I have believed and I am convinced that He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him until that day,” we need to notice Paul did not say, “I know in what I believe…” He notes that he believes in some one, not some thing.

The journey causes us to hold on to a core of our theology. The trinity, the virgin birth, Jesus being the only way to heaven, the death, burial and bodily resurrection…all these things become the core of our Faith. Issues like women pastors, which we may have a developed theological understanding, are not issues in which we argue, get mad, or separate over. The Gospel becomes primary and other issues are not as important. We learn to hold on to orthodox creeds, but all the extra denominational chatter becomes “not so much” important.

This does not suppose a low view of scripture. In fact, it supposes a very high view of scripture and allows us to deal with what appears to be inconsistencies in scripture. What do I mean by that? In Rom 16:7 Paul says, “Greet Andronicus and Junia(s), my compatriots and my fellow prisoners. They are well known to [or prominent among] the apostles, and they were in Christ before me.” There are two major interpretive problems in this verse, both of which involve the identification of Junia(s). (a) Is Junia(s) a man’s name or a woman’s name? (b) What is this individual’s relation to the apostles? Many scholars believe Junia(s) is a woman. The question now requires us to see if Junia is “outstanding among the apostles” or “well known to the apostles.” People get down into the nitty gritty of the Greek, but there is no clear consensus on “among” or “to.” What happens if it is this is a female apostle? How does that affect our understanding of women are not to teach men or women are to keep silent in the church? And how do we reconcile these questions with the reality that Priscilla is most likely the primary teacher of Apollos? We end up having to explain these away in some manner.

In other words, things are not so black and white. They require us to hold our beliefs humbly and loosely. The Journey into Faith allows us to have a grey theology, be in a healthy relationship with others, serve with others, and hold to orthodox conservative theology.

Related Posts:

• The Theology of Journey: The Goal of God’s Guidance
• The Theology of Journey: Destination and Preparation
• A Theology of Journey: Introduction

Related posts:

• A Theology of Journey: Introduction
• Thoughtful Thursdays – Liberation Theology
• A Book Recommendation: Chrysalis by Alan Jamieson
• Welcome to You
• The Need for Understanding Missional Theology

Journeying Into Faith

Reading through books of Moses (Genesis to Deuteronomy), we see how God led the people of Israel on their journey into the Promise Land. That journey mirrors much of our journey into faith. It is a journey into the depths of a relationship with God. In this post, I want to examine how God guided the nation, how they followed, and how that carries over into the journey God has in store for us.

1. The Israelites were led by the visible God
Scripture tells us that God led the nation through two visible signs. During the day, a cloud would lead them and during the evening journeys a pillar of fire would go before them. When God decided to stop, the cloud would stop and the people would settle in for an undetermined period of time. During this time the tabernacle would be assembled and the cloud would hover over the dwelling place of God. When it was time for the journey to continue, the cloud would rise, at which time the people would pack up the tabernacle and their own possessions and be prepared for the cloud to lead them through the next part of the journey.

2. The Disciples were led by the visible Son
God, live and in the flesh, led the disciples for three years. Each day Jesus would hear from God and the journey would begin anew. He took them from one end of Judah to the other, through Samaria, around and back again as He journeyed to the cross. The disciples did not know where the journey would lead from one day to the next. Rather, it was a dependance on God the Son each day.

Jesus told Thomas something fascinating post-resurrection. “Thomas”, Jesus said, “it is great that you see and believe. But what’s better will be all those who do not see yet still believe.” A few days later, Jesus ascends. A few days later we read about Pentecost.

3. Christ Followers are led by the invisible Spirit
From the ascension of Jesus until today, followers of Christ (people who do not see but still believe) have been led by the invisible Holy Spirit. That just doesn’t seem fair does it? Well, maybe not, but at least we don’t have to wait centuries between God speaking into our lives.

The difference between God leading visibly (as in the case of the nation and the disciples) and invisibly as He leads Christ-followers is that the visible God was external to the people whereas the invisible Spirit resides within each follower of Christ. The visible is not as important in our case because the invisible is always there, prompting us, teaching us and leading us.

However, there is a similarity between the Israelites after the construction of the Temple and today’s Christ-followers. During that time, the nation heard from God through dreams, visions, natural disasters, war and slavery. They also had prophets who themselves heard from God and spoke that word to the people. He even spoke in a still, small voice and through a donkey. Post-Pentecost, we see something similar. God spoke to people through visions, trances, and dreams (Acts 10:3-16), He spoke though prison sentences, an inner voice (Acts 16:1-10) and visitations from God or his messengers (Acts 23:11). Despite the invisible nature of God, he still leads experientially. Guidance is done through encounters.

Faith Markers
Along the journey through the desert, God provides faith markers to the nation to show them that not only was He still around, but He was listening and He was providing all of their needs. Whether it was manna for food or water to drink or forty years in the desert without the need for new clothes or shoes, God took care of them one day at a time.

For post-Pentecost Christians, God provides us with faith markers as well. Several years ago, during my senior year in college, I came home from the morning service, which has been quite inspiring, and sat down in my “thinking chair,” at the time it was a dirty yellow queen anne chair. It has since been re-covered and it is still my thinking chair. I put on some classical music and just closed my eyes and quieted my mind. While it wasn’t audible, it was loud in my spirit. God posed to me a question: “David, what do you want?” Without hesitating, I told God three things that I truly wanted. And no, they did not include gobs of money, fancy cars, or trivial stuff like that. They were things only God could do. For the next year, God answered each one of those. Two he provided. One he did not. However, for a year I prayed and waited and watched. That period of my life has become a faith marker. When I struggle with God and where He is leading me, or when He seems silent and far off, I go back to that period in my life and, in the words of Rich Mullins, it keeps “giving me hope to carry on.”

Those faith markers are emotional connecting points that are important in following God on this journey into faith. They are important reminders of how God has provided in the past. They keep us going as He takes us deeper into faith, particularly because He will take us through deserts where we walk into a fierce sandstorm that tests our dependence and obedience upon God.

The Goal
As I read the story of the Israelites, the disciples time with Jesus and examine my own life experience with God, I notice something important about God’s goal in how He leads us. His goal is day-by-day leadership.

If you notice how He guided the nation, they had to be ready at a moments notice to pack up and move. They could not plan into the future. They would wake up each morning knowing that today might be the day for transition. Tomorrow was never really planned. The disciples experienced the same kind of guidance. They woke up each morning not knowing what the day would bring, where they would journey next, or who they would encounter. Each day was a day of the unknown.

The past two years of my life have been a period where I longed to see God move and work. But all I have heard is silence. With me wanting to know where and when and to what God may lead us, God has chosen to rest us right where we are. There has come a point in this two year journey that I transitioned from wanting to know five years out, two years out, even a year out what God would have us do to waking up each day and asking God what He had in store for me today.

I keep going back to the Lord’s prayer quite often. There’s that part of the prayer where Jesus prays, “Give us this day our daily bread…” I paraphrase this verse according to what I believe is its intended meaning: “Give me today what I need for today and tomorrow I will come back to you and ask you again.”

The goal of the journey into faith is a total day-by-day, moment-by-moment dependence on the leadership and guidance of God. For a society enamored by goals and plans, this causes us discomfort. But the truth is, every morning we wake up to could be a day of transition. It could be the day that a loved one dies or a home is destroyed or a job is lost. It could be the day that brings great news, notice of a new job, or a move across the country. We are not promised the next second, much less the next day, month or year. We need to anticipate that each moment is a moment of transition and change.

That sometimes means God becomes silent for a period of time. That period of time can be so quiet that it screams at us, a period of time that St. John of the Cross calls the dark night of the soul. We so long for God to speak, to give us any light at the end of the tunnel (even if it is a train) that we spend every available moment crying out to Him. His silence is both exhausting and thirst-creating, so much in fact that we keep coming back for more. In doing so, He is removing our own self-reliance and developing our God-dependence. As much as we have tried to lead ourselves by our dreams, goals, and desires, we fall before Him to wake up each morning asking Him what He wants us to do today.

There comes a point in time, and it is different for each person, that this day-by-day dependence becomes our dearest friend instead of worst enemy. We learn to embrace it. We look forward to what God will provide for us today.

Related Posts:

• Trust, De-Trust, Life and the Gospel
• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• The Theology of Journey: Destination and Preparation
• A Theology of Journey: Introduction
• A Book Recommendation: Chrysalis by Alan Jamieson

Related posts:

• Best posts on Integrating Missionally – W. David Phillips from Apr 2009
• A Theology of Journey: Introduction
• A Word for the Weary
• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• Monday Highlights: God’s Victory!

The Theology of Journey

Every journey has a destination. Some of us are so interested in the destination that we speed through the journey. Others take their time, enjoying the experience. For these people, the journey is as important as the destination. In the journey of Christian faith, I believe this is also the case.

God has Given Us the Destination
I find an interesting observation in Deuteronomy chapter one. God tells the Israelites up front where they are headed. Actually, it was more of a reminder of the promise God made to Abraham. God would lead Abraham to a place he was preparing for Abraham and his descendants, a place flowing with milk and honey. In addition, the people who were Abraham’s offspring would be enslaved but once again re-inhabit the land after it had been prepared first. So in Deuteronomy 1:8, Moses reminds the people of this, telling the nation, “See, I have set the land before you. Go in and take possession of the land that the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give to them and to their offspring after them.” (ESV)

Our faith journey with God will lead us to a similar place of residence. We have been promised a place where streets are made of gold and death no longer exists. It is a place where we are whole. It is a place where God and man walk and talk in perfect relationship and transparency. It is a place of eternality. Our ultimate destination is the New Heavens and the New Earth (Revelation 21).

God is Preparing the Destination
As God was moving the Israelites, He had already been where He was sending them (Deut. 1:33). The place was already being prepared. All the Israelites has to do was go in and take the land. God was there with them but they had to go in.

Jesus reminds us in John 14 that “I am going to prepare a place for you…where I am there you will eventually be.” It is not only a place God prepares, it is a place where God is and God will be for his people. Every place God sends us He goes before us. Not only does He lead us there, He is already there. It is that way for our eternal home; it is also that way for our temporal home.

While the Destination is Important, the Journey Prepares us for the Destination
Getting to the destination is a series of stops on the journey. I believe that when the Israelites left Egypt they still lived with a slave mentality. It was what they were comfortable with. It is how they operated. This is particularly noticeable in two specific events. The first occurred on Mt. Sinai in Exodus 19-20. They were afraid to come to the mountain and speak to God directly. They wanted someone to speak to God for them. They were afraid. In addition, in Numbers 13, they saw themselves as insignificant when compared to the people living in Canaan. There is an unhealthy fear here as well. It resides within the nation of Israel. Slavery does that to people.

Getting to the Promised Land meant God had to prepare them to live free. The wilderness journey was the result.

God is preparing us for the eternal destination. A life of wholeness and perfect relationship await us for eternity. Getting there means that God seeks to shape us and prepare us through a relational and spiritual formation into the new humanity of which Jesus was the firstborn.

God is preparing us to live totally free. A journey into the dark night of the soul is often the result.

Each Stop in the Journey is Necessary
God led the people with a cloud and with fire. He led them where He wanted them to go. Each stop, each encounter was important. There were stops where Israel had to fight. There were stops where they disobeyed God. There were times when they did obey God. Each incident offered an opportunity for the nation as a whole and people in particular to see the brokenness and pain in their lives and deal with it or rejoice in the blessing and provision of God. Each stop was a relational and faith-building exercise.

As Christ-followers, we have to be aware that every place where God leads us is part of the journey. Each stop offers us the opportunity to see areas of brokenness, sin, hurt and pain in our lives. Exploring the why gives us the potential of dealing with those hangups and leaving them behind. This is part of the journey toward wholeness. Each stop affords us the ability to also experience the blessing and provision of God. All of this works to develop a relational faith with God.

Related Posts:

• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• The Theology of Journey: The Goal of God’s Guidance
• A Theology of Journey: Introduction

Related posts:

• Best posts on W. David Phillips from Apr 2009
• A Theology of Journey: Introduction
• Best posts on Integrating Missionally – W. David Phillips from Apr 2009
• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• Welcome to You

The Theology of Journey

During my doctoral work, Len Sweet said on several occasions that there needs to be an expounding on the Theology of Journey. Alan Jamieson, a New Zealand pastor, has authored two books on the topic. One is Chrysalis: The Hidden Transformation in the Journey of Faith (Faith in an Emerging Culture) and the second is Journeying in Faith.

I have begun reading Deuteronomy as part of my daily worship and I was jolted by the journey of Israel from Mt. Sinai to the Promised Land. It is as much a description of the theology of journey as anything we have in Scripture. It is the story of new God-followers on journey with God all the way into the promise land. It is the story of God developing the faith of a nation. I think it is a great place to begin to examine how God leads us into a transformational journey.

Come along with me, will you?

Related Posts:

• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• The Theology of Journey: The Goal of God’s Guidance
• The Theology of Journey: Destination and Preparation

Related posts:

• Best posts on W. David Phillips from Apr 2009
• The Theology of Journey: Grey Theology
• Welcome to You
• The Forgotten Ways
• The Theology of Journey: Destination and Preparation