Image 01

W. Davd Phillips

Integrating Missional Thinking, Living, and Culture

Archive for the ‘Ministry’ Category

Changing Culture: The Perils of Idealism

Friday, August 27th, 2010

I am continuing to work through the book To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World by James Davidson Hunter.

One the face of it, there is significant merit to the emphasis on ideas, the individual and to personal piety. Filtered through the legacy of German idealism, however, problems occur. The image this perspective offers is of culture, somehow, free-floating in the ether of consciousness. Change consciousness and one changes culture. But are ideas, values, and worldviews singularly important to cultural change? Is rational consistency the best way to resist worldviews different from one’s own and the most effective way to persuade others?

Idealism misconstrues agency, implying the capacity to bring about influence where that capacity may not exist or where it may only be weak. Idealism underplays the importance of history and historical forces and its interaction with culture as it is lived and experienced. In addition, idealism ignores the way culture is generated, coordinated, and organized. Therefore, it underrates how difficult it is to penetrate culture and influence its direction. As well, idealism mistakenly imputes a logic and rationality to culture where such linearity and reasonableness does not exist but rather contingency and accident. It communicates the message that if people just pay attention, learn better, be more consistent, they will understand better the challenges in our world today. If they have the right values, believe the right things, embrace the right worldview, they will be better equipped to engage those challenges. If they have the courage to actually jump in the fray and there choose more wisely and act more decisively, they will rise to and overcome those challenges and change the world.

(more…)

What Hinders Christians from Changing the World?

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

I am continuing to work through the book To Change the World: The Irony, Tragedy, and Possibility of Christianity in the Late Modern World by James Davidson Hunter.

To share the Gospel is to share the gift of life; the making of disciples is foundational to the Christian faith. And peoples’ lives do change profoundly when they receive the gift of grace – their attitudes and behaviors are transformed and, in turn, they can and often do have a positive effect on those around them. In a similar vein, no one would deny that law, public policy, and politics are worthy vocations for Christians to pursue. The pursuit of justice and righteousness in these vocations can give glory to God and provide great service to many. Finally, social movements oriented toward moral reform have done enormous good in the past and still do in the present. But do they change the world? The answer is both yes and no; but mostly no. Cultures simply do not change in these ways, or at least no in the way people think they do.

In a previous post, I described how getting people to have the right the heart and mind, the right values and worldview, was the prevailing way to change culture. However, if culture were simply about hearts and minds, then the influence of various minorities – gays and Jews, for example – would be relatively insignificant. And Christians would have enormous influence in shaping law, public policy and social strategy. But this is not the case.

The advocates of the dominant strategies of cultural change all tend to agree, in effect, that the reason Christians do not have more influence in shaping the culture is that Christians are just not trying hard enough, acting decisively enough, or believing thoroughly or Christianly enough. The issue for them is that Christians need to be more committed. They need to embrace more fully the Christian worldview. The burden of responsibility and action resides with the individual Christian and it is up to them to be better and do more to change the world.

The problem is twofold. First, Christians just aren’t Christian enough. Christians don’t think with an adequate enough Christian worldview. They are fuzzy-minded. They do not pray enough, and they are lazy in their duties as believers. In the same way, there are not enough people who do fully embrace God’s call on their lives, praying, understanding, and working to change the world.

But is this it? (more…)

A Common View of Culture

Thursday, August 19th, 2010

While the percentage is declining, USAmerica is still a nation that largely identifies itself as Christian. Despite having a predominately Christian self-identification, we have a decreasing expression of Christian ethics. Many would be repulsed by our claim to be a Christian nation because of the disproportionate amount of violence, sexual promiscuity, greed, and other unchristian behaviors. In a country where the majority of people are against abortion or homosexual marriage, USAmerica is a country that is on the former is entrenched in law and the latter is on the way to becoming part of the USAmerican culture.

Why the disparity in identification and culture? One answer could be that Christians have misunderstood what culture is and what is required to change culture. Let’s begin to explore culture and what it takes to transform culture.

There are many opinions about culture, but there is one predominant understanding of culture in the public arena. This view is reflected by politicians and by people of all faiths. The substance of this view can be expressed this way: The essence of culture is found in the hearts and minds of individuals, what are typically called “values.” Values are mere preferences: inclinations toward or conscious attachment to what is good and right and true. Culture is manifested in the ways these values guide actual decisions we individuals make about how to live. In this view, a culture is made up of the accumulation of values held by the majority of people and the choices made on the basis of those values.

A slightly more sophisticated version of this is found in the view of those who speak of “worldviews.” A worldview, as Chuck Colson has defined it, is “the sum total of our beliefs about the world, the ‘big picture’ that directs our daily decisions and actions… [it] is a way of seeing and comprehending all reality.” In this way, Christianity is not just a set of doctrines and beliefs and the values based on those doctrines and beliefs, but a wide-ranging and all-inclusive understanding of the world. Christianity is thus a worldview in competition with other worldviews. Though driven by ideas, worldviews exist primarily in the hearts and minds and imaginations of individuals and take form in choices made by individuals. As Colson puts it, “Our choices are shaped by what we believe is real and true, right and wrong, good and beautiful. Our choices are shaped by our worldview.” In this light, he can conclude, ” history is little more than the recoding of the rise and fall of the great ideas – the worldviews – that form our values and move us to act.” “If we are going to succeed in restoring a moral influence in American culture,” he says,” we nee to “cultivate a Christian mind” and “live out a biblical worldview”.

The resulting argument becomes this: If we are going to change our culture for the better, we need more and more individuals possessing the right values and the right worldview. When this happens, more and more people will make better choices and culture will become virtuous. As Colson argues, “A virtuous society can be created only by virtuous people, whose individual consciences guard their behavior and hold the accountable.” And so he poses the question directly: “How can we redeem a culture?… from the inside out. From the individual to the family to the community, and then outward in ever widening ripples.” Change the values of the common person for the better and good society will follow in turn.

It is this implicit view of culture that motivates certain communities of Christians, especially evangelicals, to focus on evangelism as their primary means of changing the world. Evangelism is not only a means of saving souls but of transforming individuals and, in doing so, changing culture. The logic behind this position is the belief that the problems society faces can be traced back to a loss of spiritual vitality and moral conduct. Whatever the sin is, the unhappy truth is that people have lost their moral bearings. Only by changing the hearts of individuals who engage in such acts or who sanction them, then, can real headway b made in stepping back from the precipice of social degeneration. The logic goes this way: if people’s hearts and minds are converted, they will have the right values, they will make the right choices, and the culture will change in turn.

Q4U: Do you agree with this understanding of culture and change? What is your understanding of culture and cultural change?