
MIROR: Indwelling and Incarnating
In this post, I want to expand on the “I” in MIROR, which is Incarnational. The aspect of the incarnation that we need to explore deeper is the concept of indwelling. The idea of ‘living in’ or ‘indwelling’ is connected to Michael Polanyi’s ideas of tacit and focal awareness. (1)
Polanyi’s Tacit Knowledge
Almost two years ago I was faced with the prospect of reading Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy by Michael Polanyi. Polanyi (1891-1976) was a Hungarian-British polymath whose thought and work extended across physical chemistry, economics, and philosophy. He was a Fellow of the Royal Society and a Fellow of Merton College, Oxford. (2) Len Sweet has every one of his doctoral students read Personal Knowledge either in the first or second semester. It is the only book he requires to be read by every doctoral student. It is a very difficult book to read and it felt like having a root canal without drugs. It was so difficult that I had to read Lesslie Newbigin to understand just part of what Polanyi was saying.
Polanyi proposed the idea of Tacit Knowledge. With tacit knowledge, people are not often aware of the knowledge they possess or how it can be valuable to others. Tacit knowledge is considered more valuable because it provides context for people, places, ideas, and experiences. Effective transfer of tacit knowledge generally requires extensive personal contact and trust.
Tacit knowledge is not easily shared. One of Polanyi’s famous aphorisms is: “We know more than we can tell.” Tacit knowledge consists often of habits and culture that we do not recognize in ourselves. In the field of knowledge management, the concept of tacit knowledge refers to a knowledge which is only known by an individual and that is difficult to communicate to the rest of an organization. Knowledge that is easy to communicate is called explicit knowledge. The process of transforming tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge is known as codification or articulation. (3)
Two examples of tacit knowledge include:
1. If I use my hands to feel something in the dark, I am only tacitly aware of my hands; I am focusing my attention on the surface I am exploring, not my hands. I am aware of my hands only in the fact that they are instruments being used to feel what is in the darkness.
2. The words we speak, the actions we take are not conscious for us. They become conscious when someone or some thing shows us what we are doing. As a result, we are only tacitly aware of our words and actions as we have indwelled our words and actions. They are part of who we are.
Indwelling in Jesus
In John’s Gospel, Jesus defines for his followers what is to be their relationship to him. They are to “dwell in” him, as he “dwells in” his father. Jesus was not to be the subject of their observation, but the body of which they were a part. By “indwelling” him in his body, they will both be led into a deeper understanding of the Truth and become the means by which God’s will is done in the world. (4)
The indwelling in the life of Jesus means that Jesus’ life becomes our life. In doing so, Jesus’ life flows out of our own, so much so that people see our life as a reflection and expression of the life of Jesus. We are tacitly aware of what we say and do because we are focally aware of whom we encourage, love and minister.
Jesus was “in the father”, indwelling and incarnating the father, to such great depths, that people understood his words and actions as being God’s words and actions despite the fact that Jesus never explicitly stated for our western minds, “I am God”. While Jesus understood his indwelling and incarnation, he expressed it tacitly; it just flowed from him.
Indwelling in the Church
As the Old Testament unfolds, we begin to see God’s undying love for Israel. Yet, this love and commitment is to Israel the instrument of God’s love for the rest of the nations. It becomes clear that to be God’s chosen people means not privilege but suffering, reproach, and humiliation. Israel was called to embody or indwell in her own life God’s agony over an unbelieving, disobedient world. In the New Testament, that manifestation was found in the one who would suffer the ultimate agony of death on a cross on behalf of all peoples. (5)
Where is the body of Christ is now found? In the Church. Therefore, the body of Christ is called to indwell or incarnate in its own life, both locally and universally, the love and agony of God for this unbelieving and disobedient world.
Unfortunately, we have distorted that privilege just as Israel did. We have taken the love that we should be directing to the world and we have redirected it onto ourselves. We have become the focal point of our awareness. We have become primary, not the world for which God weeps.
So what must we do?
1. Fall in love with the Godhead all over again. In our churches, we are proclaiming principles, not relationship. We preach practices, not relationship.
2. We must retell the stories of Israel as they redirected the MIROR onto themselves instead of the world they were called to love. We have done the same thing in USAmerican churches.
As Christ-followers, we have to live IN the Christian story in the living narrative of a living Jesus. When we embody, incarnate and indwell Jesus, people begin to see not the church or the person by the Godhead behind the person. And when people see Jesus for who he really is, like the woman at the well, they embrace him and run and tell all those that they know.
Notes
1. Lesslie Newbigin, The Gospel in a Pluralist Society, 98.
2. Wikipedia contributors, “Michael Polanyi,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Polanyi&oldid=243647741 (accessed October 17, 2008).
3. Wikipedia contributors, “Tacit knowledge,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tacit_knowledge&oldid=245462216 (accessed October 17, 2008).
4. Newbigin, 99.
5. Newbigin, 84.